‘Havana syndrome’-People with Too Much Time, Education & Money but not Enough Brains

bill barilko

Senate Member
Mar 4, 2009
5,868
493
83
Vancouver-by-the-Sea
It's all shit just as I called it years ago

‘Havana syndrome’ not caused by foreign adversary, US intelligence says
The involvement of overseas foes in ‘anomalous health incidents’ suffered by US diplomats and spies was deemed ‘very unlikely’


The mysterious set of symptoms known as “Havana syndrome” was not caused by an energy weapon or foreign adversary, US intelligence has concluded.

The assessment concludes a multi-year investigation into approximately 1,000 “anomalous health incidents” (AHIs) among US diplomats, spies and other employees in US embassies and missions around the world.

FILE - In this Aug. 13, 2016, file photo, Elian Gonzalez, the young Cuban rafter who was at the center of a bitter custody battle in 2000 between relatives in Miami and his father in Cuba, attends a gala for the 90th birthday of Cuban Leader Fidel Castro at the 'Karl Marx' theater in Havana, Cuba. Gonzalez returned to the public eye Sunday to praise the leader who died on Friday, Nov. 25, and fought to return him to Cuba. (Ismael Francisco, Cubadebate via AP, File)
Elián González poised to be top Cuban lawmaker decades after Florida deportation
Read more
Victims reported brain injuries, hearing loss, vertigo and strange auditory sensations, among other symptoms. Many suspected they had been victims of a targeted attack using some kind of directed energy weapon.

Of the seven intelligence agencies that undertook the investigation, five determined that “available intelligence consistently points against the involvement of US adversaries in causing the reported incidents”, according to an unclassified version of the report released on Wednesday by the House intelligence committee. Those five agencies deemed foreign adversary involvement “very unlikely”. One considered it “unlikely” and one declined to state a conclusion.

The findings were first reported by the Washington Post.

The assessment involved a painstaking effort to analyze syndrome cases for patterns that could link them, as well as a search, using forensics and geolocation data, for evidence of a directed energy weapon, unnamed officials told the Post.

“There was nothing,” one official said.

The officials told the Post they were open to new evidence that a foreign adversary had developed an energy weapon, but did not believe Russia or any other adversary was involved in these cases.

According to the AP, which was briefed on the assessment on Wednesday, in some cases the US was able to detect confusion and suspicion among adversarial governments who thought reports of the syndrome might be some kind of US plot.

The intelligence agencies “judge that there is no credible evidence that a foreign adversary has a weapon or collection device that is causing AHIs”, according to the unclassified report.

That assessment contradicted a 2022 report by a panel of expert scientists which identified pulsed electromagnetic energy and ultrasound as possible explanations for “Havana syndrome” illnesses.

The panel was convened in 2021 by the director of national intelligence and the director of the CIA. It found that some cases could not be explained by health or environmental factors, and suggested devices existed that could produce such symptoms.

But the unclassified report suggests that initial medical studies that led experts to believe that the AHIs “represented a novel medical syndrome or consistent pattern of injuries” suffered from “methodological limitations”. It also states that early analyses of suspected incidents in Cuba in 2016 and 2018 included “critical assumptions” that “were not borne out by subsequent medical and technical analysis.

“In light of this and the evidence that points away from a foreign adversary, causal mechanism or unique syndrome linked to AHIs, IC agencies assess that symptoms reported by US personnel were probably the result of factors that did not involve a foreign adversary, such as preexisting conditions, conventional illnesses, and environmental factors,” the report reads.

Three agencies have “high confidence” in that assessment, three have “moderate confidence” and one has “low confidence”.

The symptoms have been debilitating for some victims. In 2021, Joe Biden signed a law to provide compensation.

Mark Zaid, an attorney representing victims from various federal agencies, appeared to anticipate the report, tweeting on Tuesday that the findings would be “very disconcerting”. He said he had already sued for the full report under the Freedom of Information Act and planned to “challenge the conclusions”.

“Until the shrouds of secrecy are lifted and the analysis that led to today’s assertions are available and subject to proper challenge, the alleged conclusions are substantively worthless,” Zaid said on Wednesday.

“It is inconceivable based on an overwhelming number of unanswered questions that today’s report will serve as the last word.”
 

bill barilko

Senate Member
Mar 4, 2009
5,868
493
83
Vancouver-by-the-Sea
More & More & More Shit as per SOP with these Idiotic Clowns

Medical studies find no trace of physical harm in Havana syndrome patients
Two new studies find no significant differences between US government officials suffering from condition and control group



The US embassy in Havana, the site of the first recorded cases among diplomats and intelligence officials

Two new medical studies have found that US government officials suffering from Havana syndrome symptoms did not show any discernible physical damage or alteration.

One of the studies published on Monday by the federally funded National Institutes of Health (NIH) examined brain imaging, while the other looked at blood biomarkers and clinical assessments of hearing, vision, hand-eye coordination, cognitive ability and balance.

Neither study, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, detected any significant differences between a control group, and about 80 current or former US government officials suffering from a cluster of symptoms, often debilitating, known as Havana syndrome, named for the site of the first recorded cases among diplomats and intelligence officials in 2015.

Since then, hundreds of cases have been reported, mostly among US officials posted abroad, leading to theories that they had been targeted by a hitherto unknown weapon using directed energy of some sort wielded by a hostile power. Official studies and statements on what the government has called “anomalous health incidents” (AHIs) have given varying assessments on the probability such a weapon was involved.

A lawyer for several of the Havana syndrome patients said that the tests did not say anything new about the phenomenon and alleged that the way the studies were conducted raised ethical questions.

The NIH neuroimaging study found that “there were no significant differences in imaging measures of brain structure or function between individuals reporting AHIs and matched control participants after adjustment for multiple comparisons.”

It added however: “That this study did not identify a neuroimaging signature of brain injury in this AHI cohort does not detract from the seriousness of the clinical condition.”

Havana syndrome symptoms have included intense prolonged headaches, dizziness, nausea and fatigue, in some cases making it impossible for sufferers to continue working.

The second NIH study reported “there were no significant differences between individuals reporting AHIs and matched control participants with respect to most clinical, research, and biomarker measures, except for objective and self-reported measures of imbalance and symptoms of fatigue, post traumatic stress, and depression.”

Mark Zaid, a Washington DC-based lawyer representing several Havana syndrome sufferers said the studies offered “very little new substantive results”.

“Of course, the absence of evidence is not evidence and these studies therefore do nothing to undermine the theory that a foreign adversary is harming US personnel and their families with a form of directed energy,” Zaid said in a statement.

He added that he had ethical concerns with the NIH studies, including the extent to which they were truly voluntary.

“Several of my clients were told they had to participate in the study if they wanted to receive medical treatment for their injuries, a significant faux pas in a medical arena that promotes informed consent,” he said.