Archimedes and Modern Science

socratus

socratus
Dec 10, 2008
1,131
17
38
Israel
www.worldnpa.org
Archimedes and Modern Science
-----
"Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world."
/Archimedes/
--
Science is the logical exposition of a system.
Science is systematized knowledge.
Science without a system is chaos.
Therefore, "the Standard Model of Particle Physics" was invented.
----
A scientific system (first of all) must have a reference system (a fulcrum) from which one can describe
the situation in a simple logical language. From this point of view, the "big bang" theory is not suitable
for a "fulcrum" on which "a lever can be placed to turn the world"
Why?
1 - The coordinate system of "big bang" is not known.
2- "big bang" theory does not explain where the matter came from
------
Conclusion:
''. . . at least one big idea is missing.”
/ Book: "The Trouble with Physics". Page 308. Lee Smolin /
=========.
 

Attachments

  • big bang.jpg
    big bang.jpg
    57.3 KB · Views: 1

socratus

socratus
Dec 10, 2008
1,131
17
38
Israel
www.worldnpa.org
Before the Big Bang, there was no space and no time.
Before the Big Bang, there was no atmospheric pressure.
Before the Big Bang, there was airless space (pure airless space).
Pure airless space is called "cosmic vacuum" and has a temperature of zero: T=0K.
That means, so-called a "singular point of big bang" had
a cosmic vacuum as a reference frame for its development.
A "cosmic vacuum" is the missing idea in modern physics.
 
Last edited: