Well, today is the Liberal/NDP Non-Coalition Coalition Budget Day!

Tecumsehsbones

Hall of Fame Member
Mar 18, 2013
55,666
7,116
113
Washington DC
They're talking about developing Canada Post real estate holdings which sounds like a good idea. Would be a lot of prime property bought for pennies on the dollar at todays rates.
No kidding, the Postal Service near me sold off a post office. It's now a Buddhist monastery.

Go figure.
 

bob the dog

Council Member
Aug 14, 2020
1,168
919
113
Easy to lose weight while speedy around .

In my complex I see people ordering MacDonald’s on door dash . Sad but true . More money than brains .
It all goes on a credit card that they can make a minimum monthly payment on.
 

bob the dog

Council Member
Aug 14, 2020
1,168
919
113
Would you lives 10m from the CPR mainline?

View attachment 21824

Depends on the price. Thing to do would be to buy it as a housing project and stall for 10 minutes until the Liberals and their program are booted.

Also, what is the expected future of the rail yard? Could it be the next plot of land to be redeveloped? One of the Inca's problems I'm told was they built cities on their most fertile ground near rivers. Could grow garlic.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
23,253
8,077
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Depends on the price. Thing to do would be to buy it as a housing project and stall for 10 minutes until the Liberals and their program are booted.

Also, what is the expected future of the rail yard? Could it be the next plot of land to be redeveloped? One of the Inca's problems I'm told was they built cities on their most fertile ground near rivers. Could grow garlic.
Creosote soaked ground for a 100 years, among other things.
1713313322843.jpeg
But I suppose as long as each Micro-Dwelling has a level 3 electric car charger we’d still be saving the planet.
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
23,253
8,077
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Margaret Thatcher once said “the problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people’s money.” The Trudeau government, as it unveiled its ninth federal budget on Tuesday, seemed intent on testing the truth of that theory, behaving as if there were endless pockets to pilfer.

As expected, Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland’s Tuesday afternoon budget address spelled bad news for some of Canada’s most productive and entrepreneurial citizens, outlining forthcoming tax hikes on corporations and high-income Canadians — notably ratcheting up taxes on capital gains accrued from investment assets like secondary residences.

The 416-page budget document tabled by Freeland on Tuesday was unambiguous about the reasoning behind these redistributive measures, reading: “To grow the middle class and invest in younger Canadians — while keeping their taxes lower — new generational investments in Budget 2024 will be supported by contributions from the wealthiest Canadians.”

What will the wealthiest of Canadians do? Those with liquid assets, or assets to liquidize?

The hours leading up to the 4PM ET budget announcement were filled with a palpable sense of foreboding, with news breaking on Tuesday morning that tax hikes were coming for better-off Canadians and job creators. This, despite Freeland fielding a slew of last-minute appeals from economists and members of the business community to pivot to a more pro-growth direction.

Even before becoming prime minister, Trudeau exhibited a total nonchalance toward debt that could only have come from someone who’s never in his life had to worry about money.

“The commitment needs to be a commitment to grow the economy and the budget will balance itself,” Trudeau famously told CPAC’s Peter Van Dusen during his response to the Harper government’s 2014 budget — the last balanced federal budget on the books.
1713320987589.jpeg
Justin Trudeau would sweep into power the next year on a platform of running three consecutive budget deficits, assuring Canadians that historically low interest rates would shield them from the consequences of his spendthrift ways. Now was the time, Trudeau insisted, for the federal government to spend lavishly on big-ticket infrastructure projects and other worthwhile pursuits.

Nine years and nine consecutive budget deficits later, Trudeau has little to show for the orgy of spending. The promised infrastructure upgrades never really materialized — heck, the trains aren’t even running on-time in the federal government’s own backyard of Ottawa. Those historically low interest rates, meanwhile, have done a vicious U-turn, forcing the federal government to turn hat-in-hand to Canada’s entrepreneurs and job creators.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Twin_Moose

pgs

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 29, 2008
26,673
7,005
113
B.C.
Meh, scrotums are overrated anyway. If I had mine removed due to cancer and had a pouch installed, where I can keep my truck keys, I could wear sweats for the rest of my life and not need pockets.
I was trying for a smart ass response , but who could beat that one . Too f,ng funny . My eyes are watering .
 

Ron in Regina

"Voice of the West" Party
Apr 9, 2008
23,253
8,077
113
Regina, Saskatchewan
Ahem! "Scrota."
1713357417789.jpeg
This year’s budget, like other recent budgets, does not include plans to end debt-financed spending. Over the next five years (of which the Liberal/NDP will only be in power for 1.5 years), the smallest projected deficit is $20-billion in 2028-29. For the 2024-25 budget year, the government is projecting the deficit will be $39.8-billion. This is in effect a time bomb for a future government that has to come along and clean up after Justin & Jagmeet.

On a sadly comical note, the government will spend $11-million to advertise its climate change policies. No other details were released on what elements of the government’s policies the campaign will highlight. The government also says it will amend the Financial Administration Act to give Ottawa the authority to require financial institutions to use federally dictated labels for auto-deposited government payments. The measure is a response to the government’s struggle to get banks to use consistent labelling for the carbon price rebate.
 

petros

The Central Scrutinizer
Nov 21, 2008
109,446
11,476
113
Low Earth Orbit
View attachment 21836
This year’s budget, like other recent budgets, does not include plans to end debt-financed spending. Over the next five years (of which the Liberal/NDP will only be in power for 1.5 years), the smallest projected deficit is $20-billion in 2028-29. For the 2024-25 budget year, the government is projecting the deficit will be $39.8-billion. This is in effect a time bomb for a future government that has to come along and clean up after Justin & Jagmeet.

On a sadly comical note, the government will spend $11-million to advertise its climate change policies. No other details were released on what elements of the government’s policies the campaign will highlight. The government also says it will amend the Financial Administration Act to give Ottawa the authority to require financial institutions to use federally dictated labels for auto-deposited government payments. The measure is a response to the government’s struggle to get banks to use consistent labelling for the carbon price rebate.
I want my carbon rebate in carbon. High value-added carbon materials (HVCMs) to be specific. Ill accept diamonds, bbq coal, new or used motor oil, nano tubes, graphene, activated carbon, carbon fiber, snow tires and beef.